Case Summary
The suit was filed by the plaintiff, Salasil, for fixation of boundary and injunction. The plaintiff was continuously absent, and the court dismissed the suit for want of prosecution.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not provide representation.
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not provide representation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff continuously absent and no representation as well.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Salasil
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Haneefa
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hasker Muhammed
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- D Hive Complete Architectural Solutions
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shaji Divakaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Salasil vs Muhammed Haneefa et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Salasil vs Muhammed Haneefa et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.