Case Summary
The petitioner is Sakthikulangara Nidhi Limited represented by Viju Sreedharanpillai, and the respondent is Sindhu. The case involves a petition to restore a suit that was previously dismissed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to restore the suit was allowed as the respondent was absent during the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed in the interests of justice as the respondent remained absent.
The petition was allowed in the interests of justice as the respondent remained absent.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavit and in the interests of justice I am of the view that one more opportunity is to be granted to the petitioner to proceed with the matter.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, petition allowed. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sakthikulangara Nidhi Limited
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Viju Sreedharanpillai
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sindhu
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv.Vidhya Sagar.D.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
to restore the above numbered suit on file
Evidence:
Hence the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sakthikulangara Nidhi Limited et al vs Sindhu regarding restoration of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sakthikulangara Nidhi Limited et al vs Sindhu regarding restoration of suit