Case Summary
Plaintiff Sakkeena filed a suit seeking injunction against defendant Saidalavi, but the suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Unknown
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for injunction. The counsel for plaintiff reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiff is called. Absent. Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sakkeena
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- Daughter of Beeran
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saidalavi
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- Son of Enu @ Kunhimuhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking injunction against the defendant
Evidence:
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff in court.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sakkeena vs Saidalavi regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Sakkeena vs Saidalavi regarding injunction