Case Summary
The plaintiff, Sajitha. T, is seeking money from defendants No. 2 to 6 after they allegedly sold a shop belonging to her without her consent. Conflict arises due to a license agreement and a security deposit she paid.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) with 6% interest and costs of the suit
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that defendants No. 2 to 6 must pay the plaintiff 30,000/- with interest and also the costs of the suit. No relief is granted against defendant No. 1.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff is proved by her evidence and supported by Exhibits A1 to A6.
The claim of the plaintiff is proved by her evidence and supported by Exhibits A1 to A6.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff is proved by her evidence and supported by Exhibits A1 to A6.
The claim of the plaintiff is proved by her evidence and supported by Exhibits A1 to A6.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence put forth by the plaintiff remains unchallenged. Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to get 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) from defendants No. 2 to 6.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendants No. 2 to 6 are directed to pay jointly and severally 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) to the plaintiffs with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajitha. T
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.K. Ashraf
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pathummu
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saheeda
- Party Age
- 31
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sabir
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammad Swalih
- Party Age
- 27
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Notary attested copy of Licence Agreement executed between plaintiff and defendants, Copy of Lawyer Notice.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.M. Haneefa
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Sanal Kumar Padanapurath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants No.2 to 6 are directed to pay jointly and severally 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants No. 2 to 6 are directed to pay jointly and severally 30,000/- (Rupees Thirty Thousand Only) to the plaintiffs with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till realisation.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants are directed to pay jointly and severally the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The Defendants are also directed to pay jointly and severally the costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
License Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document serves as the license agreement under which the plaintiff and defendant No.1 occupied the shop room.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidences the notice sent by the plaintiff to the defendants regarding the issue.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents consist of postal receipts related to the notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Acknowledgment card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents show acknowledgment of receipt related to the lawyer notice sent to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Unclaimed Notice with Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document notes the return of the lawyer notice as unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Sajitha. T vs K.K. Ashraf et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Sajitha. T vs K.K. Ashraf et al regarding realization of money