Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 748/2019

Case between Sajitha Muhammedkutty vs Nazar et al regarding dismissal of the suit

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
approximately-6 years
Case Closed
Tue, 08/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajitha Muhammedkutty is the plaintiff, and Nazar and others are the defendants. The case was dismissed because the plaintiff was not present and ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case with costs because the plaintiff was not present and ready for evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case with costs because the plaintiff was not present and ready for evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and was not ready for evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to appear and was not ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff submits no instructions. Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed with cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajitha Muhammedkutty
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazar
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thankamani
Party Age
57
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsa
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anandu
Party Age
14
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Rahib K.Y
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Law Firm
Safal Vliyaveedan
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.R. Divakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.Saritha U.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.A.T Anilkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.Jose Paul Thottam
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.Benraj K.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.Fathima Razak
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advs.Aiswarya Sajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff is not present or ready for evidence in listed case.
Evidence:
Dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajitha Muhammedkutty vs Nazar et al regarding dismissal of the suit
Case Code Year
Case between Sajitha Muhammedkutty vs Nazar et al regarding dismissal of the suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won