Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 129/2018

Case between Sajitha Mahin vs Sheriff regarding eviction petition under Section 5 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-11-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sajitha Mahin filed a petition for eviction against Sheriff, who is running a flex advertisement business as a tenant. The case involves disputes over unpaid rent and the validity of rental agreements.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed in part, fixing the fair rent for the contested premises at Rs. 30 per square foot with an annual increase of 10%. The petitioner is also entitled to costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Fair rent fixed at Rs. 30/- per square feet with 10% increase annually
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was allowed in part, fixing the fair rent for the contested premises at Rs. 30 per square foot with an annual increase of 10%. The petitioner is also entitled to costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the petitioner established ownership and need for the premises, and determined fair rent based on local market conditions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the petitioner established ownership and need for the premises, and determined fair rent based on local market conditions.
Supporting Evidence
Thus on overall consideration of entire materials bearing in mind dictum laid down in celebrated decision, Edger Ferus V Abraham Ittycheria (2004 (1)KLT 767), this court is of firm view that rent of petition schedule building can be fixed @ Rs.30/- per sq. ft. with 10% hike per annum from the date of filing of this petition.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition allowed in part as follows; 1. The petition under section 5(1) of the Act is allowed thereby fixing the fair rent of the petition schedule room at the rate of Rs.30/- per square feet, with 10% increase on every year from the date of filing of this petition.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sajitha Mahin
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheriff
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale Deed No.45/2012, Copy of Lawyer's notice, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment card, Reply notice issued by the counsel for the respondent, Gift Deed No. 2785/2019
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.M. Abdul Jaleel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nithin K.G.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.A. Ajmal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dinesh R. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Soumya T.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.K. Revi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ebin V.Y.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joseph George A.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
Fixation of fair rent for the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
The Court finds it just and reasonable to fix the fair rent at the rate of Rs.30 per sq ft for the petition schedule building at the time of filing of the rent control petition.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document proving ownership of the property in question.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the respondent seeking fixation of fair rent.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt of the notice by the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Response from the respondent's counsel regarding the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documentation related to the transfer of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipts relevant to the property, though subject to objection.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Tax Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipts relevant to the property, though subject to objection.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report providing evidence regarding the condition and rent of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Rough Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Visual aid accompanying the Commission Report.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sajitha Mahin vs Sheriff regarding eviction petition under Section 5 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965
Case Code Year
Case between Sajitha Mahin vs Sheriff regarding eviction petition under Section 5 of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1965

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.X. Joseph Jason vs Noble George regarding eviction and rent fixation
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between P.B Gopalakrishnan vs Ms. Dilshana Siyad regarding Rent Control Petition
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Keecheri Sree Rama Varma Kerala Pattarya Samajam vs P.U. Rameshan regarding rent control compliance
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. M.N Subramanian et al vs M/s Jigucheon Pvt Ltd et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Hameed et al vs Shamsudheen et al regarding Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown