Case Summary
Saji Samuel and Swapna Lakshmanan are involved in a suit that has been resolved through a compromise. The case was heard and closed on the same day.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise petition. The case was closed in terms of the compromise, which forms part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Compromise shall form part of decree.
Judgment Evidence:
I.A 5/25 (Compromise Petition) allowed. Closed in terms of compromise.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saji Samuel
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Swapna Lakshmanan
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Philip N. Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anju Mary
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Compromise petition allowed and closed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
I.A 5/25 (Compromise Petition) allowed. Closed in terms of compromise.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saji Samuel vs Swapna Lakshmanan regarding compromise
Case Code Year
Case between Saji Samuel vs Swapna Lakshmanan regarding compromise
Case Flags
Out-of-Court Settlement