Case Summary
Case involves a complaint under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act for a dishonoured cheque, ultimately settled by the complainant resulting in the accused being acquitted.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Acquittal
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Final Judgment
No
The accused is acquitted under section 257 of the Cr.P.C. due to the settlement reached by the complainant with no further grievance against the accused.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence
In the result, the accused is acquitted. u/s. 257 Cr.P.C.
Judgment Evidence:
Accused is acquitted u/s.257 Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sainudheen
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hareesh
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Unknown
Defendants Documents
Unknown
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Adv. K.T. Ajayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Sri.E.K Ashraf Sulaiman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Acquittal
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted under section 257 of the Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
The accused is acquitted u/s.257 Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case - Cheque Dishonour
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sainudheen et al vs Hareesh et al regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Code Year
Case between Sainudheen et al vs Hareesh et al regarding dishonoured cheque
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Out-of-Court Settlement
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act