Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 619/2019

Case between Saiju vs Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam et al regarding perpetual injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the plaintiff Saiju and the Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam along with other defendants. The plaintiff filed for a decree of perpetual injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and there was no representation, leading to dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saiju
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. P. Babnarji
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam
Relation
represented by its General Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. K. Natesan
Relation
General Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SNDP Yogam, Cherthala Union
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. N. Babu
Relation
Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.D. Syamdas
Relation
Returning Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
D. Sajeev Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
George Mathews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nizam. A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Beena. M (D1&D2)
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. C. Usha Devi (D3 to D14)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a decree of perpetual injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saiju vs Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam et al regarding perpetual injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Saiju vs Sree Narayana Dharma Paripalana Yogam et al regarding perpetual injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won