Case Summary
The case involves the plaintiff Saifudeen seeking the realization of money from the defendant Sivaprasad. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, and no instructions were provided to the counsel.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of instructions provided to the counsel.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent represented. Counsel submitted that no instruction from plaintiff. BCF not remitted. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Saifudeen
- Party Age
- 46
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sivaprasad
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- KRISHNAN. S. RAJ.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Realisation of Money
Case Code
Case between Saifudeen vs Sivaprasad regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Saifudeen vs Sivaprasad regarding realisation of money