Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 407 OF 2014

Case between Saidali et al vs Sakkeer Husain et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V., B.A, LL.B., MUNSIFF
Order Date
2017-02-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Saidali and Nazar, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants, Sakkeer Husain, Vasu, and Manikandan. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs were absent and unrepresented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs due to their absence and the lack of representation. The defendants were awarded costs.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by the plaintiffs due to their absence and the lack of representation. The defendants were awarded costs.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs were absent and did not represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiffs' counsel reported that he has no instruction from his client. Name of the plaintiffs are called absent. No representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed with costs to defendants.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saidali
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nazar
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sakkeer Husain
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasu
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manikandan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.T.P. Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mehroof Shihab
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.P.P. Basheer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed with costs to defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Saidali et al vs Sakkeer Husain et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Saidali et al vs Sakkeer Husain et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Hamza vs Erattaparambil Hamza et al regarding petition allowance with costs
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Mullanmadakkal Mammi vs Beeran Haji et al regarding petition on medical grounds
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vettikkat Parikkuzhiyil Beerali vs Thayyil Kader Haji regarding unknown matter
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between P.Damkumar vs Palakkavalappil Puthiyamaliyekkal Gulam Ali et al regarding default
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Thameem vs Muhammed Abdul Noor regarding Default Judgment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit Defendant Won