Case Summary
This case involves Sahida O as the plaintiff and Saheed and others as defendants. The plaintiff filed the suit for fixation of boundaries and partition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent their case.
Plaintiff was continuously absent and did not represent their case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant present. Plaintiff continuously absent, no representation on his part.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sahida O
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saheed
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shareef
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Amina S
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Baby
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abdul Muneer R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Jayachandran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reeja.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Fixation of boundaries
Case Code
Case between Sahida O vs Saheed et al regarding fixation of boundaries and partition
Case Code Year
Case between Sahida O vs Saheed et al regarding fixation of boundaries and partition