Case Summary
Sabeena.S. is the Decree Holder and S.Sajeevan is the Judgment Debtor. The court examined a petition for executing an order but found that the Decree Holder was not cooperating.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition due to the Decree Holder not cooperating for executing the order.
Key Reasoning:
The Decree Holder was not cooperating for executing the order as per the Amin's report.
The Decree Holder was not cooperating for executing the order as per the Amin's report.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Amin filed report stating that the Decree Holder not cooperating for executing the order.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence EP dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sabeena.S.
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S.Sajeevan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A.Rasheed
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The execution petition was dismissed due to the Decree Holder not cooperating.
Evidence:
Amin filed report stating that the Decree Holder not co-operating for executing the order. Hence EP dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sabeena.S. vs S.Sajeevan regarding execution of order
Case Code Year
Case between Sabeena.S. vs S.Sajeevan regarding execution of order
Case Flags
Adalath Resolved