Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 868/2019

Case between Sabeena D’Cruz et al vs Babu et al regarding perpetual injunction.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-24
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Sabeena D’Cruz and C.V Mathew, filed this suit for a perpetual injunction against the defendants, Babu, Devaki, Santhosh, and Dr. Latha. The court heard the matter and transferred the case for joint trial with another pending suit.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The court ordered the transfer of the case to the Additional Munsiff Court for joint trial with another case. Both parties are required to appear on the specified date.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the transfer of the case to the Additional Munsiff Court for joint trial with another case. Both parties are required to appear on the specified date.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Case suomoto advanced. As per order in OP(TP) 143/2025 dated 17/10/2025, the Hon’ble Principal District Court, Kollam transferred the above numbered suit to Additional Munsiff Court, Kollam for join trial with OS 391/2017.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sabeena D’Cruz
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.V Mathew
Party Age
61
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Babu
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Devaki
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhosh
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr. Latha
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Mohana babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bindu B.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Jani
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nisa Fazil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for perpetual injunction.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff u/s 26 Order VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure for perpetual injunction.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sabeena D’Cruz et al vs Babu et al regarding perpetual injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Sabeena D’Cruz et al vs Babu et al regarding perpetual injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won