Case Summary
S. Sunil and Sajeevan are the plaintiffs who filed the suit for permanent prohibitory injunction. The defendants include Renuka and her family members.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of both the plaintiffs and defendants without representation. No steps were taken in the case.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S. Sunil
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajeevan
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Renuka
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- S.Mohan Kumar
- Relation
- H/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bhavana Mohan
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bharath Mohan
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- A. Jani
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Amal S.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sarath S.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- D.Baiju Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for permanent prohibitory injunction
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between S. Sunil et al vs Renuka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between S. Sunil et al vs Renuka et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction