Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 764/2021

Case between R.Vinod Kumar et al vs Adv. B.G.Harindranath et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-03
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 07/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and the matter was deemed infructuous.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and the matter was deemed infructuous.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, represented. Defendant absent, represented. Submitted that matter infructuous.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
R.Vinod Kumar
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mithun Sagar
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adv. B.G.Harindranath
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The SNDP Yogam
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The SNDP Yogam Council
Relation
represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramesh Kumar R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Lekha Vamadevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hariprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nizam M Beenu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
suit is filed by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
suit is filed by the plaintiff for declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between R.Vinod Kumar et al vs Adv. B.G.Harindranath et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between R.Vinod Kumar et al vs Adv. B.G.Harindranath et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam District
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 07/03/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Salman Faris vs The South Indian Bank Ltd et al regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between C. Baburajan Pillai vs Nair Service Society et al regarding interim injunction and election conduct.
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between John.K.J vs Sister Vinni Vetkkattel et al regarding review of order.
MUNSIFF COURT, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R.Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.Venkateshwar Enterprises et al regarding Realisation of Money.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between M/s.A.R. Wood Industries Pvt.Ltd vs M/s.R.J.Enterprises regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won