Case Summary
Roshan Shajan is the plaintiff, and N C Chacko along with two others are the defendants. The case concerns a suit that has been settled through a compromise agreement.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the compromise agreement allowed by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement. Compromise Agreement shall form part of decree.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Roshan Shajan
- Party Age
- 23
- Relation
- S/o Late Shajimon Mathew
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N C Chacko
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o Chacko
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Johnson Jacob
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o Jacob
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lillykutty Chacko
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o Chacko
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Roy Vanchipurackal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- B Ashok
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Chandhini V Vijayan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Compromise agreement
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the compromise agreement and decreed the suit in terms of it.
Reference:
IA 2/25
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Roshan Shajan vs N C Chacko et al regarding a compromise agreement
Case Code Year
Case between Roshan Shajan vs N C Chacko et al regarding a compromise agreement