Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 742/2022

Case between Rohit Viswam vs Krishnakumar regarding mediation report

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-15
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rohit Viswam is the plaintiff, and Krishnakumar is the defendant. This case involves a mediation report that both parties agreed upon, leading to a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The mediation report was accepted, and the suit is decreed in accordance with the terms agreed upon by both parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee, if any, as per law.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The mediation report was accepted, and the suit is decreed in accordance with the terms agreed upon by both parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation report were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation report were found lawful and not opposed to public policy.
Supporting Evidence
Perused the terms and found lawful and not opposed to public policy.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rohit Viswam
Party Age
32
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnakumar
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreelakshmi P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D.M. Nowfal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed in terms of mediation report.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee, if any, as per law.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to refund of court fee, if any, as per law.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rohit Viswam vs Krishnakumar regarding mediation report
Case Code Year
Case between Rohit Viswam vs Krishnakumar regarding mediation report

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won