Case Summary
Robert Justin Raj filed a suit against Geetha and R.Sajeevan seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent them from obstructing his use of a pathway leading to his property. The defendants were placed exparte as they failed to appear before the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the use of plaint B schedule pathway
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from obstructing the use of the pathway. The defendants were restrained from any acts detrimental to the plaintiff's interest over the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved his case.
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved his case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved his case.
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proved his case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff’s unchallenged evidence proves his case and he is entitled to a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction as sought for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and the defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the use of plaint B schedule pathway by the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Robert Justin Raj
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R.Sajeevan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of sale deed No: 1386/2017, copy of Property Tax Receipt
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.P.Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- D.Supriya
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendants from obstructing the use of plaint B schedule pathway by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and the defendants are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from obstructing the use of plaint B schedule pathway by the plaintiff.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of sale deed proving plaintiff's ownership of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of property tax receipt supporting the plaintiff's case concerning the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Commission report supporting the plaintiff's claims regarding the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Rough Sketch
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Rough sketch associated with the commission report relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019