Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 597/2024

Case between Retnamma.S vs Radha et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-10-06
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 10/06/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Retnamma.S, the plaintiff, filed a suit for injunction against Radha and others. The case concluded with both parties reaching a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise with both parties agreeing to the lawful terms. The memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of compromise with both parties agreeing to the lawful terms. The memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Both parties signed in the compromise and its terms and conditions are found lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 7/2025 allowed. Suit decreed in terms of compromise. The memorandum of agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Retnamma.S
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radha
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulekha
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Deepthi
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anulekshmi
Party Age
36
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anila
Party Age
36
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishnan S.Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
D. baiju Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Pradeep Kumar S.J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Hence IA 7/2025 allowed. Suit decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Retnamma.S vs Radha et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Retnamma.S vs Radha et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 10/06/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won