OS. No.543/2021

Case between Retnamma et al vs Suresh Babu Rajan et al regarding mandatory and permanent injunction

Court

Munsiff Court, Kollam

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-10-13

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This is a suit filed by the plaintiffs for mandatory and permanent injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Retnamma
Party Age: 64
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Devarajan
Party Age: 62
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Pushparajan
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sheela K.S
Party Age: 34
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suresh Babu Rajan
Party Age: 54
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sreekumar
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sanath Subin Raj
Party Age: 21
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sheeja Devi
Party Age: 44
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Vishnu Narayanan L.R, Rakesh Karuthan vila Rajan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: John George
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Plaintiff sought a mandatory and permanent injunction.

Evidence:

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for mandatory and permanent injunction u/s 26 O VII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification