Case Summary
The plaintiff, Renjini R. Krishnan, filed a suit for injunction. Both the plaintiff and defendants were absent during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of both the plaintiff and the defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 11th day of July, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Renjini R. Krishnan
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Omanayamma
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sofi
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subin
- Party Age
- 20
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.Anees
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T.Muhammed Shafi
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R.Gopakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Poul Antony
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff's suit for injunction was dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Renjini R. Krishnan vs Omanayamma et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Renjini R. Krishnan vs Omanayamma et al regarding Injunction