Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.1621/2019

Case between Remani vs Radhika regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-06-12
Duration
approximately-1 year 6 months
Case Closed
Wed, 06/12/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Remani, the plaintiff, filed a suit which was dismissed due to lack of representation over several court postings. Radhika is the defendant in this matter.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for lack of representation from the plaintiff's side.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for lack of representation from the plaintiff's side.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to represent the case despite multiple postings.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to represent the case despite multiple postings.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner not represented. There is no representation for the petitioner for the last several postings from 06.12.2022 onwards.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence IA 01/2021 is dismissed for default. Accordingly suit is also dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Remani
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhika
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P. Saji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa Mohan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ahalya Prakash
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. Vivek
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Neena James
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Ashok Iyyani
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
There is no representation for the petitioner for the last several postings from 06.12.2022 onwards. ... Hence IA 01/2021 is dismissed for default. Accordingly suit is also dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Remani vs Radhika regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Remani vs Radhika regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Wed, 06/12/2024 - 12:00
From
Sat, 06/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 06/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won