OS. No. 181/2020

Case between Rekha Manoj vs Rajamani et al regarding realisation of money.

Court

The Court of the Additional Munsiff, Kollam

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-06-21

Duration

approximately-5 years 0 days

Case Closed

Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, led by Rekha Manoj, are seeking to recover money. The case includes two minor plaintiffs represented by their mother, Rekha Manoj.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court rejected the plaintiffs' case due to the absence of both parties and failure to remit necessary fees.

Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' lack of representation and failure to comply with procedural requirements.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

Both side absent represented. BCF not remitted. No application filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 21th day of June, 2025. Plaint rejected.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rekha Manoj
Party Age: 38
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sanjana
Party Age: 15
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Sanjay
Party Age: 13
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Rajamani
Party Age: 74
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sunil Kumar.S
Party Age: 51
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sujith Kumar.S
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: T. Saproo
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Parippally R Raveendran
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Rejected

Description:

The suit is rejected.

Evidence:

Plaint rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification