Case Summary
The plaintiff, Rejula beevi @ Rejula, filed a suit against the defendants for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not present to provide evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rejula beevi @ Rejula
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shihabudeen
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Seeth
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Yakoob
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.I. Alexander Panicker
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- S. Abdul Karim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed for permanent prohibitory injunction
Evidence:
The counsel for plaintiff submitted that suit may be dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rejula beevi @ Rejula vs Shihabudeen et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Rejula beevi @ Rejula vs Shihabudeen et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.