Case Summary
The plaintiff, Reji, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from trespassing into his property and altering its boundaries. The case revolves around a dispute over access to pathways and ownership of specific land parcels.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint A, B, and C schedule properties and from demolishing or altering the existing boundaries of the properties and also from committing any waste therein.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, permanently restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaint properties and altering the boundaries. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.
Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.
Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.
Supporting Evidence
Exts.A1 to A6 and C1 series, would prove the plaint claim. There is no contra evidence to prove otherwise. Plaintiff's case stands proved and unchallenged by the pleadings and evidences.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: i. The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint A, B, and C schedule properties and from demolishing or altering the existing boundaries of the properties and also from committing any waste therein.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reji
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sudarsana Babu
- Party Age
- 52
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreelatha
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Udayakumar
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Agustin Levi
- Party Age
- 55
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yemuna Levi
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Settlement Deed No. 2751/2012, Settlement Deed No. 2750/2012, Sale Deed No. 549/2008, Land tax receipts.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G. S. Krishna Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Permanently restrained the defendants from trespassing into the plaint A, B, and C schedule properties.
Evidence:
The defendants and their men are permanently restrained from trespassing into the plaint A, B, and C schedule properties and from demolishing or altering the existing boundaries of the properties.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the plaintiff's ownership of the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Settlement Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the plaintiff's ownership of the plaint B schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Sale deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proved the plaintiff's ownership of the plaint C schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Land Tax receipts
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed that the plaintiff is remitting land tax for the plaint schedule properties.
Reference:
Exts.A4, A5, A6
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Identified the plaint schedule property and its boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reji vs Sudarsana Babu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Reji vs Sudarsana Babu et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.