Case Summary
The plaintiff Reji Mathew filed a suit against the defendant Tintu Antony K.A. The case was about the plaintiff's failure to pay the required balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaint was rejected for non-payment of the balance court fee by the plaintiff. The pending interim applications were also closed, and no costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance Court Fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reji Mathew
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Tintu Antony K.A
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abraham P. George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Ratheesh M.B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anas C.A.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance Court Fee.
Evidence:
Hence the plaint is rejected for non payment of Balance Court Fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reji Mathew vs Tintu Antony K.A regarding non-payment of court fees.
Case Code Year
Case between Reji Mathew vs Tintu Antony K.A regarding non-payment of court fees.