Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 305/2012

Case between Rehma Aslam vs Snehalatha, Sudha regarding settlement of disputes

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND. P.
Order Date
2025-06-18
Duration
approximately-13 years 0 days
Case Closed
Wed, 06/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rehma Aslam is the plaintiff in this case, and Snehalatha and Sudha are the defendants. The parties have settled their disputes through out of court discussions.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by the parties, which settled the dispute. The suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Joint compromise will form part of the decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the joint compromise filed by the parties, which settled the dispute. The suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The joint compromise is accepted, since the terms are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The joint compromise is accepted, since the terms are lawful.
Supporting Evidence
The joint compromise is accepted, since the terms are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rehma Aslam
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Snehalatha
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sudha
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Saabir F. Haq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Sheema Saabir
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Iqbal. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Shibu
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The survey plan prepared by Sri Sivanadan dated 14/01/2019 will form part of the decree.
Reference:
null

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rehma Aslam vs Snehalatha, Sudha regarding settlement of disputes
Case Code Year
Case between Rehma Aslam vs Snehalatha, Sudha regarding settlement of disputes

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2012 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 06/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sunitha vs Shibu Purushothaman regarding temporary injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between The Federal Bank, Ltd vs Siyad. S, Haseena Beevi regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Margaret Solomon Cruz et al vs Mabel James et al regarding declaration of title and injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Babu Rajan N. et al vs The Government Of Kerala regarding declaration of civil death
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sheena vs Anvar et al regarding temporary injunction against illegal business.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Civil Suit Defendant Won