R.C.P. No. 70/2021

Case between Regional soports Centre vs Uma Omanakuttan regarding rent control petition

Court

THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER

Judge

SMT. REEJA R. NAIR

Order Date

2024-06-15

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Regional soports Centre, filed a rent control petition against the respondent, Uma Omanakuttan. The matter was settled between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the rent control petition as not pressed after both sides submitted that the matter was settled.

Key Reasoning:

Why Defendant Won:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Regional soports Centre
Relation: represented by

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Uma Omanakuttan

Plaintiffs Documents

N/A

Defendants Documents

N/A

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Rajagopalan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sandhya C. Nai
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sojo. J. Kallidukkil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Asher Revi Job
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Vandana P.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Ramanarayanan G.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

Rent control petition dismissed as not pressed.

Evidence: