Case Summary
Reetha is the decree holder and J.Thomas is among the judgment debtors. The case is about executing a decree in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court acknowledged the execution petition filed by the decree holder and confirmed that the execution was satisfied, leading to the closure of the petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The execution petition was satisfied and closed as the decree holder was represented.
The execution petition was satisfied and closed as the decree holder was represented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The execution petition was satisfied and closed as the decree holder was represented.
The execution petition was satisfied and closed as the decree holder was represented.
Supporting Evidence
The execution petition was satisfied and closed as the decree holder was represented.
Judgment Evidence:
EP satisfied. EP Closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Reetha
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- J.Thomas
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- C/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joseph.J
- Party Age
- 72
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Telma
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lucy
- Party Age
- 58
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.Titus
- Party Age
- 70
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- V.L. Baby
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reetha vs J.Thomas et al regarding execution petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Reetha vs J.Thomas et al regarding execution petition.