Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 81/2024

Case between Reena Thomas et al vs Shibu Thandamparambil et al regarding dismissal for default.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smt. Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
Case Code No.
81
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves plaintiffs Reena Thomas, Ponnappan, and Vinl S. Anil against defendants Shibu Thandamparambil, Vinayachandran @ Vijayan, and Koruthodu Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to provide evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and failure to provide evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed for default. No cost.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reena Thomas
Party Age
47
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ponnappan
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinl S. Anil
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shibu Thandamparambil
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinayachandran @ Vijayan
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Koruthodu Grama Panchayath
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Darly M. Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas Kurian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arun Samuel
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Panchayat

Similar Cases

Case between Shanavas P.H. vs Mundakayam Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of a suit.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Philip vs Erumely Grama Panchayath regarding declaration and injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aruna D. Pillai et al vs Pradeep Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Venugopalan Nair vs Padmini Gopinadhan et al regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won