Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 627/2020

Case between Reema Jose vs Robin Thomas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-22
Duration
approximately-5 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Reema Jose seeking a declaration of her right to use a property for access to her land from her brother, Robin Thomas. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has threatened to block her access, prompting this legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court declared the plaintiff's right to use a property as a means for ingress and egress to her land and issued a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent obstructions.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's use of the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court declared the plaintiff's right to use a property as a means for ingress and egress to her land and issued a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant to prevent obstructions.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her right of easement of necessity over the property needed for access.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established her right of easement of necessity over the property needed for access.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has thus established her right of easement of necessity over plaint C schedule property and proved her case beyond preponderance of probabilities which enables her to get a declaration of her right over plaint C schedule property for using it as an ingress and egress to her plaint A schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed with costs as follows: i.The plaintiff is entitled to get a declaration that she has the right to use the plaint C schedule property as a way for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property for its beneficial enjoyment in all lawful means.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Reema Jose
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Robin Thomas
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No.3655/2019, Tax receipt.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Thomas M. Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhil K. Madhav
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prasanth V.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.N. Joshi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santhi K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Latha Susan Cherian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is granted a declaration to use plaint C schedule property for ingress and egress to plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff is entitled to get a declaration that she has the right to use the plaint C schedule property as a way for ingress and egress to the plaint A schedule property for its beneficial enjoyment in all lawful means.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction granted to restrain the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's use of plaint C schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant and his men are restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from doing anything so as to defeat the right of the plaintiff over plaint C schedule property and from obstructing the plaintiff in his peaceful possession and use of plaint C schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No.3655/2019 establishing plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Tax receipt dated 18.06.2020 supporting plaintiff's possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Settlement Deed No.3674/1999 related to the defendant's ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition deed No.2955/1989 establishing the family background of property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Commission Report dated 09.09.2020 confirming the existence of the plaint C schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Reema Jose vs Robin Thomas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs
Case Code Year
Case between Reema Jose vs Robin Thomas regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 10/22/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won