Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 365/2021

Case between RDS OASIS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION vs Dr.Paul K. Mathew et al regarding realization of money

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-07-03
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, RDS OASIS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, filed a suit to recover misused funds from the defendants, Dr.Paul K. Mathew and M.J. Sebastian, related to unauthorized expenditures made by the association. The defendants failed to appear in court, and their absence led to the plaintiff's evidence being uncontested.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.6,67,018/- from the defendants, along with interest and costs. The defendants were absent and did not contest the suit, leading to a favorable judgment for the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.6,67,018/- from the defendants and to receive interest at specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.6,67,018/- from the defendants, along with interest and costs. The defendants were absent and did not contest the suit, leading to a favorable judgment for the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff due to the absence of any contest from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff due to the absence of any contest from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts. A1, A5, A7 to A20 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.6,67,018/- (Rupees six lakh sixty seven thousand and eighteen only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
RDS OASIS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr.Paul K. Mathew
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M.J. Sebastian
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original memorandum of association and bye-laws of the RDS OASIS Owners association, Auditor's statements, legal notices.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Blaze K. Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Nivea Liz Peter Fernandez
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Urmila Zacharia
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Judy Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Paul K. Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks recovery of Rs.6,67,018/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.6,67,018/- (Rupees six lakh sixty seven thousand and eighteen only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks interest on the amount due from the date of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.6,67,018/- from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks interest on the amount due from the date of the decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.6,67,018/- from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff seeks recovery of costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original memorandum of association and bye-laws
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Foundational document establishing the plaintiff's association and its governance.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certified copy of Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to interim order in a previous case relevant to the current claim.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of minutes of annual general body meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the decisions made regarding association expenditures.
Reference:
Ext.A7(a)
Document Type: Copy of minutes of annual general body meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Records agreements made related to financial matters impacting the current claim.
Reference:
Ext.A8(a)
Document Type: Original audited financial statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the financial transactions relevant to the claim made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Copy of minutes of annual general body meeting
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Contains resolutions impacting the decision to recover funds.
Reference:
Ext.A10(a)
Document Type: Copy of the notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the first defendant regarding the financial claim.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Copy of the notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the second defendant about the financial claim.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Original of the reply letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The response from the first defendant denying liability.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Legal notice issued
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Formally informs the defendants of the claim against them.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery related to the notice sent to the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Original Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of delivery related to the notice sent to the second defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A16
Document Type: Original of the acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receival confirmation from the first defendant regarding a mailing.
Reference:
Ext.A17
Document Type: Original of the acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receival confirmation from the second defendant regarding a mailing.
Reference:
Ext.A18
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Financial records relevant to the transactions made by the association.
Reference:
Ext.A19
Document Type: Statement of Accounts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Financial records relevant to the transactions made by the association.
Reference:
Ext.A20

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Unauthorized expenditure of funds
Case Code
Case between RDS OASIS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION vs Dr.Paul K. Mathew et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between RDS OASIS OWNER'S ASSOCIATION vs Dr.Paul K. Mathew et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won