Case Summary
The plaintiff, Ravi Manohar, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants who attempted to trespass onto his property. The defendants are neighbors who claimed rights to the land and threatened the plaintiff to cut open a pathway.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing and drawing any pipelines or poles or pits over the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing on the plaint schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff established his ownership and prevented the defendants' claims.
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff established his ownership and prevented the defendants' claims.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff established his ownership and prevented the defendants' claims.
The evidence and documents presented by the plaintiff established his ownership and prevented the defendants' claims.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendants 1 to 6 and men under them from restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing committing any act of waste or drawing any pipelines or poles or pits over the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ravi Manohar
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Arun Kumar
- Party Age
- 40
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Soman
- Party Age
- 70
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Thomas John
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Babu Varghese
- Party Age
- 56
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Aibin Jacob
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified true copy of Gift Deed No. 1075/1981, true copy of Tax Receipt Thandaper No. 6466, true copy of Location Sketch
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rajeev P Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendants restrained from trespassing or drawing pipelines over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendants 1 to 6 and men under them from restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from trespassing committing any act of waste or drawing any pipelines or poles or pits over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit awarded to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The plaintiffs are entitled to costs of the suit.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Gift Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the plaintiff's ownership and possession of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Tax receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's claim regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Location Sketch
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Visual representation of the property in dispute.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ravi Manohar vs Arun Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ravi Manohar vs Arun Kumar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction