Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 143/2020

Case between Raveendran vs Sanil et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Ragi.S.
Order Date
2025-01-22
Duration
Case Closed
Wed, 01/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Raveendran filed a suit against Sanil and others for fixation of boundary and injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not represented and failed to adduce evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not represented and failed to adduce evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was not represented and called absent.

Judgment Evidence:

As the plaintiff not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raveendran
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanil
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jaya
Party Age
45
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandrababu
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Remani
Party Age
60
Relation
Sister of
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Leeja
Party Age
35
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.Sreekumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Salmath.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
S.Suresh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
Evidence:
suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raveendran vs Sanil et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendran vs Sanil et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 01/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won