Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 890/2025

Case between Raveendra Babu et al vs M/s. Mumbai Wagon Company et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2026-01-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Raveendra Babu and Dinesh Raveendra Babu, initiated the case against M/s. Mumbai Wagon Company and Vinod R. Nair. The matter was not pressed by the plaintiffs leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed. All pending Interim Applications are closed. No costs were imposed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed. All pending Interim Applications are closed. No costs were imposed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not press the matter, leading to a dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not press the matter, leading to a dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the plaintiff submits matter is not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raveendra Babu
Party Age
76
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dinesh Raveendra Babu
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. Mumbai Wagon Company
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinod R. Nair
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Manu Roy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Eliswa Saritha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sadchith P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sibi Karun
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Memo accepted. Hence the suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raveendra Babu et al vs M/s. Mumbai Wagon Company et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Raveendra Babu et al vs M/s. Mumbai Wagon Company et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won