Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RP.No. 04/2024 in OS.No. 582/2015

Case between Ratheesh vs Sarojini et al regarding restoration of a suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt.Ragi.S., Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
approximately-1 year 3 months
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Petitioner/Plaintiff Ratheesh who filed a petition to restore a dismissed suit against Respondents/Defendants, including Sarojini and others. The dismissal was due to his absence in court for a trial, which he attributed to an accident.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition for restoration of the suit due to the petitioner's failure to appear and present evidence substantiating his claims. This was viewed as laches on the petitioner's part.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for restoration of the suit due to the petitioner's failure to appear and present evidence substantiating his claims. This was viewed as laches on the petitioner's part.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner failed to provide sufficient evidence for his reasons of non-appearance.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner's lack of appearance and failure to take steps against the first respondent led to the petition's dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner not taken any steps to the 1st respondent and thereby the petition against him was dismissed. It shows latches on the part of the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Petition dismissed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ratheesh
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sarojini
Party Age
70
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Annadurai Ethiraj
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Basker
Party Age
20
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ritheq
Party Age
10
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dileep.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Restoration of the suit on file
Evidence:
the present application is only liable to be dismissed and I do so.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ratheesh vs Sarojini et al regarding restoration of a suit
Case Code Year
Case between Ratheesh vs Sarojini et al regarding restoration of a suit

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Thu, 01/01/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won