Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 887/2018

Case between Ranjith Varma vs M. Balakrishnan regarding suit dismissal

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-12-02
Duration
Case Closed
Mon, 12/02/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ranjith Varma filed a suit against M. Balakrishnan. The plaintiff decided not to press the suit, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ranjith Varma
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M. Balakrishnan
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.P. Ramnath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bepin Paul
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sandhya S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Antony Tharian
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. Rajesh Kottakkal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Varghese Varghee M.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Shalu Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepak S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P. Shibi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C.K. Sunil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A.N. Premlal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.T. Jayanthi
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B. Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Syamkumar P.H.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The counsel for the plaintiff submits that suit is not pressed. Filed a memo to that effect. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ranjith Varma vs M. Balakrishnan regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Ranjith Varma vs M. Balakrishnan regarding suit dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Mon, 01/01/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 12/02/2024 - 12:00
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won