Case Summary
Ramachandran.T.K is the plaintiff who initiated the suit against Jalaja Sreenivasan, the defendant. The court rejected the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff and non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case. As a result, the court rejected the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the rejection of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the rejection of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the rejection of the suit.
The plaintiff's absence and lack of representation led to the rejection of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made in court, resulting in the suit's rejection.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is rejected. Pronounced by me, in the open court on this the 27th day of February, 2024.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramachandran.T.K
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jalaja Sreenivasan
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.Natarajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The suit is rejected due to the plaintiff's absence and non-remittance of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Suit is rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramachandran.T.K vs Jalaja Sreenivasan regarding court fee
Case Code Year
Case between Ramachandran.T.K vs Jalaja Sreenivasan regarding court fee