Case Summary
The plaintiff, Ramachandran, seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendant, Sreejith, to restrain him from encroaching on his property. The case involves familial disputes and allegations of threats made by the defendant.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant and his men are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule house and causing any kind of inconvenience in the peaceful life of the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, prohibiting the defendant from encroaching on the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs have succeeded in proving his case with sufficient evidence and the defendant failed to present his defense.
The plaintiffs have succeeded in proving his case with sufficient evidence and the defendant failed to present his defense.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
By producing Exts. A1 and A2 and by deposing in tune with the plaint averments in the affidavit, the plaintiffs have succeeded in proving his case. Moreover, there is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, this suit is decreed as follows: (i) The defendant and his men are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule house and causing any kind of inconvenience in the peaceful life of the plaintiff.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ramachandran
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sreejith
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of order in OP(HMA) No. 785/2019 dated 24.10.2019, Copy of order in OP. No. 980/2018 dated 30.05.2019.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mundakkal B. Anub
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendant and his men are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule house and causing any kind of inconvenience in the peaceful life of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, this suit is decreed as follows: (i) The defendant and his men are restrained from encroaching into the plaint schedule house and causing any kind of inconvenience in the peaceful life of the plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
(ii) The plaintiff is entitled to realise costs of the suit from the defendant.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Order in OP (HMA)No.785/2019 dated 24/10/2019 of the Hon'ble Family Court, Kollam.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Order
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Order in OP No.980/2018 dated 30/05/2019 of the Hon'ble Family Court, Kollam.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ramachandran vs Sreejith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Ramachandran vs Sreejith regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.