Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 28/2020

Case between Raju et al vs Sindhu. K et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-16
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 12/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for injunction under the Code of Civil Procedure. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent without representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff without representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff without representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent, no representation.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raju
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Thankamani. S
Party Age
55
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu. K
Party Age
46
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
N. K. Kavirajan
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santhakumari. K
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dileep. S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Krishna Priya. G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vibin Bahuleyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anushikk G. J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashik C. Bose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Somasekharan Pillai
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
R. S. Prasanth
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Plaintiff filed suit for injunction.
Evidence:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for injunction u/s 26 order VII and Rule 1 to 7 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Raju et al vs Sindhu. K et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Raju et al vs Sindhu. K et al regarding injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 12/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won