Case Summary
Rajendran filed a suit for partition of property belonging to his father and the husband of the defendant, Leelavathi. The defendant admitted the claim and relinquished her share over the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled that the plaint schedule property is allotted to the plaintiff, Rajendran, as the defendant, Leelavathi, relinquished her share over the property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendant admitted the plaint claim and relinquished her right over the property.
The defendant admitted the plaint claim and relinquished her right over the property.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendant admitted the plaint claim and relinquished her right over the property.
The defendant admitted the plaint claim and relinquished her right over the property.
Supporting Evidence
The defendant had filed written statement by admitting the plaint claim and by stating that as she is having 87 years of age, she is relinquishing her right over the property.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the comprehensive decree passed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule property is allotted to the share of plaintiff. 2. Defendant had relinquished her share over the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rajendran
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Leelavathi
- Party Age
- 87
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- G. Govindan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- George Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sidharth Kuruppath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaint schedule property is allotted to the share of plaintiff.
Evidence:
In the result, the comprehensive decree passed as follows: 1.The plaint schedule property is allotted to the share of plaintiff.
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Defendant had relinquished her share over the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
2.Defendant had relinquished her share over the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff shall furnish value of for purchasing Non Judicial Stamp paper for engrossing the final decree.
Evidence:
3.The plaintiff shall furnish value of for purchasing Non Judicial Stamp paper for engrossing the final decree.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kolenchery
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajendran vs Leelavathi regarding partition of property.
Case Code Year
Case between Rajendran vs Leelavathi regarding partition of property.