OS. No.723/2020

Case between Rajeev vs Mangalavally et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court

Munsiff Court, Kollam

Judge

Smt. Sofia.T.A.

Order Date

2025-10-03

Duration

Case Closed

Fri, 10/03/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Rajeev, is seeking a declaration and injunction against the defendants, including Mangalavally, Vanaja, and Krishnanunni. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence in court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit has been dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence without a valid reason.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear in court despite being notified.

Why Defendant Won:
Not available

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff not present. Not submit any valid reason for non appearance.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rajeev
Party Age: 60
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mangalavally
Party Age: 74
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vanaja
Party Age: 70
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Krishnanunni
Party Age: 32
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Panambil S. Jayakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Boris Paul
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Arun Shibu F.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Lathika S.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration

Outcome: Not Decided

Description:

Plaintiff sought a declaration related to the suit.

Evidence:

This suit is filed by the plaintiff for declaration and injunction

Relief Type: Injunction