Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 783/2019

Case between Rajasree M.S vs Silda Varghese regarding withdrawal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-09-16
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 09/16/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajasree M.S filed a suit against Silda Varghese. The plaintiff was absent and not represented, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented in court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not show intent to pursue the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not show intent to pursue the case.
Supporting Evidence
Clearly the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajasree M.S
Party Age
44
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Silda Varghese
Party Age
40
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.B.Thankappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.T.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ashish Vidyadharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreeja K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Archana K.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gopalakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Babu Cherukara
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Clearly the plaintiff is not interested to proceed with the suit. Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajasree M.S vs Silda Varghese regarding withdrawal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Rajasree M.S vs Silda Varghese regarding withdrawal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 09/16/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won