Case Summary
Rahul P.R is the plaintiff, while Jose Mampilly is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case since the plaintiff was absent and did not take steps for representation or evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rahul P.R
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jose Mampilly
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sunil Jacob
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rajesh K.B
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's case was dismissed due to absence and lack of representation.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant present. Listed case. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence nor has taken steps. Dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rahul P.R vs Jose Mampilly regarding suit hearing.
Case Code Year
Case between Rahul P.R vs Jose Mampilly regarding suit hearing.