Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 186/2024

Case between Rahima Beevi vs Ashar A M et al regarding injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-07-14
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Rahima Beevi, filed a suit for injunction against the defendants Ashar A M and Sherin B. The matter was settled between the parties in a mediation session.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise reached by the parties and decreed the suit in its terms, ordering the refund of court fees to the plaintiffs with no order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fees paid by the plaintiffs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise reached by the parties and decreed the suit in its terms, ordering the refund of court fees to the plaintiffs with no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties reached a compromise which was accepted by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties reached a compromise which was accepted by the court.
Supporting Evidence
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaintiff claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rahima Beevi
Party Age
68
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashar A M
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sherin B
Party Age
31
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sumith M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shajahan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in its terms as the parties had settled the matter in mediation session.
Evidence:
Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rahima Beevi vs Ashar A M et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Rahima Beevi vs Ashar A M et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won