Case Summary
This case involves plaintiffs Rafeeq and his wife Phousy Rafeeq against the defendant K.M. Abdul Rahiman. The suit was not pressed and was dismissed as such.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Rafeeq
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Phousy Rafeeq
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K.M. Abdul Rahiman
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.A. Ashraf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Hashim Althaf
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.K. Sindhu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- R. Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G. Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit not pressed. Memo filed to that effect. Hence suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rafeeq et al vs K.M. Abdul Rahiman regarding suit dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Rafeeq et al vs K.M. Abdul Rahiman regarding suit dismissal