Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 518/2017

Case between Radhamani vs Mahin et al regarding realisation of money

Court
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Radhamani, filed the suit for realisation of money. The subject matter was settled between the parties in a mediation session, and they entered into a compromise.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court accepted the compromise and decreed the suit in its terms. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded, and there is no order as to costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Court fees refunded
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court accepted the compromise and decreed the suit in its terms. The court fees paid by the plaintiffs will be refunded, and there is no order as to costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole through the compromise.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole through the compromise.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhamani
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mahin
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nadeera
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Adheena
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Allu
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Bijoy S.Dharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
G.K.madhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Kishore R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The compromise is accepted and the suit is decreed in its terms.
Evidence:
I have gone through the compromise and I am satisfied that the parties had adjusted the plaint claim as a whole by the said compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Radhamani vs Mahin et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Radhamani vs Mahin et al regarding realisation of money

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Sun, 01/01/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 08/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Vijayendran, Chithra vs Yamunadevi regarding review of order
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Navasudeen.S vs Sira Group regarding review of an earlier order
Court of the Munsiff, Kollam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sajeev vs T.Unnikrishna Pillai regarding setting aside an exparte decree.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Gopakumar vs K.S.Abdul Manaf regarding Realisation of Money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shibina. S et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won