Case Summary
Radha filed a suit for permanent prohibitory injunction against Rajesh and Vijayalekshmi. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and did not present any evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff's suit was dismissed for default due to her absence and lack of evidence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent and not filed chief affidavit.
Judgment Evidence:
the suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Radha
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajesh
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vijayalekshmi
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nazeer Kakkantayyam
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V. Jyothi Sagar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Permanent prohibitory injunction sought by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence, suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Radha vs Rajesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Radha vs Rajesh et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction