Case Summary
The plaintiff is Pushpavally, and the defendants are Raji and Biju. The case involves a suit for injunction and declaration under the Code of Civil Procedure.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and no representation was made. The suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The absence of the plaintiff resulted in no steps being taken in the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pushpavally
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raji
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Biju
- Party Age
- 40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rupa Babu S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for injunction & declaration
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Relief Type:
Declaration
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiffs for injunction & declaration
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pushpavally vs Raji et al regarding injunction & declaration
Case Code Year
Case between Pushpavally vs Raji et al regarding injunction & declaration